Copyright-broken

  • Top / Home
  • CensorshipMachine
  • LinkTax
  • Email MEPs
  • Call MEPs
  • About this site
  • About Xnet
Hot

Copyright-broken Reddit: what the Internet could look like after the EU copyright reform

A new copyright reform is going on in the EU. It forces websites to monitor and filter all your uploads (Article 13) and creates an unnecessary and disproportionate new copyright for press publishers (Article 11).

This is how Reddit would look like if the EU approves the censorship machine and breaks our Internet

It is a huge attack to our freedom to access and distribute information and content on the Internet - tell your MEP to stop this nonsense before 20 June!

r/images i.imgur 2h u/Concerned_Redditor_EU_23
Copyright-broken Reddit: Reddit-style campaign website to raise awareness on the threats to Internet of the EU copyright reform. Made by Xnet, non Reddit affiliated.
0118 999 881 999 119 7253 Comments
1010011010

The Censorship Machine

Artcile 13 of the copyright reform proposal makes it mandatory for any platform that users can upload content to to adopt automated technologies that scan all uploads in search of content "identified" by copyrightholders to either block it or pay royalties for it.

Platforms would be forced to invest in filter technologies for video, audio, images, text, images of text and basically anything that can be protected by copyright or similar rights.

r/videos youtube 3h u/Xnet /r/all
Stop the copyright Censorship Machine, #SavetheMeme, our rights & freedoms
4 Comments
4413

The upload filter will block any content identified by rightsholders

The software won't be able to evaluate perfectly legal uses of copyrighted content. This will overturn our rights to quote, parody, criticism, use for education purposes, for reporting current events... and many other common uses nowadays vastly allowed by rightsholders.

The censorship machine shoots first and doesn't ask questions later.

r/sciencefiction i.imgur 2y u/Kubrick_Fan GIF
Newly-Discovered Draft of STAR WARS Script Confirms Han Shot First
383 Comments
8016

Many memes, gifs, remixes, parodies, etc. will simply vanish from the Internet

...like that Han Solo gif.

r/memes, r/photoshopbattles, r/gaming and many others will be hit hard as well as any social media website.

The filter applies to all kinds of user uploaded content, including, videos, images, texts, audios, scores, etc.

r/memes i.imgur 2h u/CalamardoMeme
When r/memes is threatened
162 Comments
6147

Using automated tools to block content from being created will build an infrastructure of censorship. It is a serious attack on our fundamental rights to free expression and privacy.

Copyright as a censorship tool, sounds familiar?

r/techonology theverge.com 5h u/venomspice GIF
Samsung made YouTube remove video of GTA mod that turns Note 7 into a bomb
690 Comments
690

What? Is this upload filter even legal?

The are two rulings of the European Court of Justice which prohibit the monitoring practices the upload filter will impose on Internet websites.

Art. 13 also makes websites legally responsible for the contents uploaded by their users, pushing them to aggressively police and censor uploads to avoid liabilities. This collides against the safe harbor protections of the E-Commerce Directive put in place to protect our freedom of expression.

Six Member States have raised concerns about the legality of the proposal in these regards. Yet the EU Commission and Council are still all in for it.

The European Commission is hoping that it can exploit a loophole in EU law. Because the proposal is bullying platforms into filtering, rather than explicitly demanding it, the Commission hopes that it can avoid the Directive being overturned in court.

r/Europe copybuzz.com 4h u/CopyBuzz_C_de_Cock Image
©: EU countries question legality & attack on fundamental rights of upload filter
199 Comments
748

Mandatory Filtering proposals harm innovation and curb competition

The economic cost to implement filtering bots is huge (Content-ID cost $60 million and it is still far from perfect). Established Internet giants such as YouTube and Facebook will be fine but smaller websites will struggle to pay the licenses for it (e.g. from $10.000 to $25.000 a month for Audible Magic) or face legal reprisals.

Startups would be hit twice as hard because they would need to explain to potential investors why they will need to massively invest in content filtering, which still might not be good enough for the courts in case of lawsuit.

r/technology eff.org 4h u/Elliot_Harmon_Bot
Copyright Law Shouldn’t Pick Winners
313 Comments
109

Once these scanning technologies are developed, it is very tempting for our governments to demand that Internet platforms filter content for other purposes, such as (miss-)combating fake news and hate speech; or for repressive regimes around the world to use them to suppress political dissent or enforce anti-LGBT laws or others.

It literally always happens that restrictions that are imposed for one reason end up being used for other purposes. Worse still, the EU currently has a strong leadership role in global discussions on internet freedom and fundamental rights. The censorship machine will be used by dictatorships around the world to justify human rights abuses and Europe will be silenced.

Europe would be using much of the same technology to limit its citizens’ freedom of expression that is used in China for political censorship.


The LinkTax

Article 11 of the EU copyright reform proposal creates a new 20 years right for publishers to charge fees for snippets of text that accompany hyperlinks. The so-called LinkTax applies, for example, to that little bit of text that shows up when you share news on Reddit or on social media.

r/worldnews elpais.com 90 days u/Tommaso_Koch_EP
Battle lines drawn over new European copyright law
140 Comments
6393

Ads and courts

Small news aggreggators, social websites, forums, etc. will struggle to find the resources to pay the tax (e.g. using more ads), or face legal reprisals.

r/announcements 41d u/reddit_legal_
Recent changes of EU legislation force us to use more ads :-/
4951 Comments
20167

Great damage to press diversity, freedom of information and freedom of expression

Only major websites will be able to pay these fees and only major news sites will get linked to, ensuring the dominance of entrenched players.

A modern democratic society needs plural and wide access to news and opinions for public debate, the link must be saved.

Of course, fake news and state-funded propaganda outlets won't demand payment of the LinkTax. So, the LinkTax will incentivise websites to promote fake news and propaganda.

r/internetisbeautiful i.imgur 6h u/SaveTheLink_forOnceNotZelda
#SavetheLink
135 Comments
8172

A LinkTax has already proven to fail

Old media firms are pressuring lawmakers for a law that will restrict linking on the Internet, even though existing legislation of the like have already proven to fail miserably.

When a similar law going after Google's money was introduced in Spain, Google News immediately closed and it did not pay a single euro for the tax.

r/worldwidenews 4h u/Dominic_Rushe_R
Google News Spain to close in response to story links 'tax'
www.theguardian.com
245 Comments
856

Ironically, introduction of the link tax resulted in a 10 percent to 15 percent reduction of visitors, and advertising revenues, for Spanish local publishers (those who lobbied for it, but also those who didn't).

Similarly in Germany, publishers voluntarily allowed Google to re-index their sites without payment. After complaining that Google has too much power, the link tax in Germany gave Google even more power.

r/dataisbeautiful gigaom.com 6h u/Mathew_Ingram
External traffic to Spanish news sites plummets after Google move
527 Comments
16859

Still, the big publishing industry insists to defend it as a workable solution. Even with a cheap trick to make us think the Spanish link tax works...

r/Europe xnet-x.net 6h u/Xnet_
Publishing Industry self-pays the Google Tax to itself in Spain to present the Link Tax idea as feasible
537 Comments
167

It would seem clear that the LinkTax is a bad measure overall, yet, big publishers hang on to the idea that it will solve all their problems, even if it breaks the internet and curtails our rights.


How can we stop this nonsense?

The copyright proposal still has to go through some steps before its approval. We must contact our MEPs to tell them that we oppose this dangerous proposals, specially to the ones from JURI, the lead committee.

Tell them that Article 11 and Article 13 (and recitals) are a very bad idea that will greatly harm our rights and freedoms, the technological development in Europe and the Internet as a whole.

Even if you are not living in the European Union if this mesures are approved, they will set a terrible precedent and will be quickly demanded by copyright lobbysts elsewhere and replicated.


You can contact your MEPs via:

- email easily with this tool: https://www.saveyourinternet.eu/home

- phone for free here: https://www.saveyourinternet.eu/home


Also, JURI (Legal Affairs) committee members are listed here:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/juri/members.html

There you can find their email, phone and even twitter account :)



About this site

Copyright-broken Reddit is a Reddit-style campaign website to inform about and act to prevent the very harmful proposals of the current EU copyright reform.

This site has been created by Alfa Sánchez for Xnet, which has nothing to do with Reddit, we just love it and its community :) The posts, users, comment, votes numbers etc. are all made up.

Any questions, suggestions or complaints can be sent here: info@xnet-x.net


Powered by


This site is under licence CC BY-SA 4.0